Healthcare Efficiency: Does Capitalism Improve Quality?
Health is a human right and should not work at all under the laws of the free, capitalist market - at least that's the position of business ethicists like Prof. Dr. Giovanni Maio, Director of the Institute of Ethics and History of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, at the 15. National Industry Conference Health Economy in Rostock.
Federal Minister Jens Spahn, on the other hand, made it clear in his speech at the 15.06.19 in Rostock that this was not so easy: he announced a discussion on the quality of health care, especially with regard to in-hospital quality measurements in hospitals, but also improvements in the area of care very important.
The Efficiency Dilemma: Between Regulation and Competition
Regarding regulation and legislation, however, Spahn finds himself in a dilemma between efficiency and necessary regulation: on the one hand, he finds legislation and regulation important: for example, to grant access to medical care for everyone, everywhere, including in rural areas.
"Without demand planning, we simply would not have any doctors in the country, because everyone wants to work in the cities." It is also efficient to put old people care products on the doorstep half a year in advance, but that makes no sense as well as the combination of assisted living and short-term care. According to Minister of Health, this must be sensibly regulated in order to create a framework in the competition.
Federal Minister of Health: Overregulation hinders innovation
After all, overregulation is detrimental to the innovative strength that is so important in healthcare, and not just because competition helps to make processes more efficient and thus also to save costs. "If we regulate too much, StartUps will move to the US with new ideas," Spahn noted.
Because that in other countries, especially in the digital field is much further, was apparently recognized in the Federal Ministry of Health. Spahn referred to current developments of large digital companies such as Apple or Google in the health sector.
Digitization as a marginal topic in German politics
Nevertheless, the important topic of digitization, which is also pioneering in all other areas, was dealt with quickly in just a few sentences. This gives reason to fear that it has just not been recognized how much digital technology will affect all areas of society, including quality in hospitals and care.
How far this could change socially is shown by a thesis that I heard at a lecture just two days later at the University of Witten-Herdecke: In the context of digitization, specialist knowledge will become less important - and with it, for example, the importance of the medical profession. Rather, in a digitized world, interpersonal, empathic skills, such as being nurses, will be more in demand. This could completely change the meaning of the relevant labor force in the labor market.
Privacy, German fear and the look abroad
After all, Spahn noted with regard to the German fear topic privacy: "We have to make active here, if we do not want to end up suffering." If you look at countries that are already much further in the digital development, it quickly becomes clear that there are still a number of steps to be taken in practicing this active design.
Of course, the best example of this is Estonia, which, when visiting a few years ago, clearly showed me how old-fashioned and inefficient administrative processes really are in Germany. And how much more efficient it could be - but also that the issue of data protection will be the sticking point, especially in critical health care.
When health data is managed digitally
An average Este, for example, needs 15 minutes for a tax return. The record for starting a business is 18 minutes. With an electronic signature you can conclude contracts in a few minutes. The parliamentary election can be done in five minutes by mobile phone from the sofa. And a Cabinet meeting lasts only about 45 minutes - because the ministers no longer have to dig through piles of paper.
Of course, the Estonians can also digitally view their entire health data transparently online, they will not cumbersome as in Germany on outdated storage media pass - and especially not just among doctors and health insurance. Only marry and divorce can not be done there over the Internet.
Efficiency as a panacea for more quality?
In fact, in addition to efficiency, this is the most important argument for digital administration: the transparency and accessibility of one's own data for each individual citizen. The system should also be safer than paper management, even if there were already hacker attacks that were successfully defended.
If you now consider how much time and money you waste in Germany by postal vote or for the tax return. Or for contracts, can only be enthusiastic about the Estonian system - right?
Digitizing hype vs. digitization frustration
In any case, the Estonians I met were always impressed by their efficient, digital administration. This efficiency, in order to save both time and money, is also the reason why Estonia's administration has relied fully on electronic data processing since the founding of the country.
If you ask your representatives about the problems that we are constantly discussing about data security and privacy, they gladly return the question: Can we use Google or Facebook? Or they answer with commonplaces: A completely secure system can not exist.
How economical may administration be?
Although that's certainly true, this mass of well-made self-PR irritated me a bit. What I found, almost accustomed to the German officials, even more irritating, was the measure in which economic thinking was also accompanied by government agencies with the e-government services.
Since this also concerns the digitized health administration, here we are quickly back to the question of medical ethics raised above: How economically should administration be organized, and especially in the health sector?
When the state does marketing
After all, the whole thing has long since become a marketing topic: the digital signature has already been successfully exported to other countries, including Switzerland and Azerbaijan. Taavi Kotka, secretary-general for ICT at the Estonian Ministry of Economic Affairs, stated in a speech and later in a video interview, quite openly, that it should be allowed to buy together citizenship rights in different countries.
On the one hand, of course, it's great when citizens can benefit from a leaner state. On the other hand, it is a bit strange for me to publicly think about how to market these efficient structures in other countries as well.
More knowledge - eCourses or personal advice
Offline download: Download this text as PDF - Read usage rights, Because we do not automatically submit the title of this text for privacy reasons: When buying in "interests" the title register if support is needed. After buying text exclusively Download at this URL (please save).
Your eCourse on Demand: Choose your personal eCourse on this or another desired topic, As a PDF download. Up to 30 lessons with each 4 learning task + final lesson. Please enter the title under "interests". Alternatively, we are happy to put together your course for you or offer you a personal regular eMailCourse including supervision and certificate - all further information!
Consultant packages: You want to increase your reach or address applicants as an employer? For these and other topics we offer special Consultant packages (overview) - For example, a personal phone call (price is per hour).