The Google idea further thought
Everyone decides for themselves, with whom and with whom he wants to work in this time. In other Company something similar is done. Employees go on sabbaticals, they sit in other areas or participate in "paging programs".
We picked up these ideas and developed them further. We encouraged employees to work as researchers in their own company. Who would be better suited to this than so-called potential forces, whose above-average motivation we assumed. The removal from everyday work, according to our assumption, would not only serve the development of the participant but also directly benefit the company.
Leadership without result
We were able to convince the personnel managers of a classically structured energy industry group of our idea: In a two-day workshop, we discussed with the potential candidates what it means to experiment boldly and experimentally in the management and organizational context.
We showed examples from ten years of experimental accompaniment and discussed the prerequisites for the success of this approach. In the end, three groups formed, one of which set up the following research hypothesis:
Half a day creative time per week
"Providing our employees half a day of creative time each week will give rise to new ideas that have a very positive impact on our company's culture of innovation."
Although the Board of Managing Directors had approved the program for potential candidates, we thought it would be sensible to additionally win a promoter from top management. Mr. S., a very smart, young board, was enthusiastic about the idea and commitment of potential candidates.
4 Questions about innovation management
He said his support. Already in the design of the experiment, several questions arose:
- What costs are involved if the employees are only creative, but not productive for half a day?
- What hostility from other departments are to be feared?
- How can employees really use their creative time as such?
- How do you solve the conflict between the day-to-day task and the creative time?
How structured should creative time be?
Some suggested structuring the creative time. The others disagreed because you can not be creative on command. The one required documentation, the others did not exactly want that. It turned out that these were insoluble problems.
In our opinion, should be tried without any prescription, and one should be surprised by the result. Finally, an overall concept for the experiment was developed and a test group selected. Kick-off workshops were planned to explain the project. They only waited for the starting shot.
If the organization strikes
But then the organizational logic increased. Because Mr. S. wanted to present the results to his colleagues at the next board meeting, the creative time experiment was translated into the templates of an investment application.
Benefits and goals were anticipated, resource requirements were calculated, and ultimately the open experiment was demoted to the project using milestones. And since only board members were allowed to present in this committee, our research group was available for further questions. Mr. S. presented behind closed door.
Leadership as a counterweight to the organization
In the run-up, it was emphasized several times that it was only a formal act. The experiment was not at stake, because Mr. S. knew his colleagues and he would do so only in his own area of responsibility. But it came quite differently: without further explanation, the Board stopped all initiatives. The only comment: In times of savings and efficiency increase fit this kind of experiment not to the course of the organization.
At our urging Mr. S. was ready to personally communicate this decision to the potential forces. Two months later there was a showdown. At the end of his monologue, Mr. S. said, "I've learned by now that there's little other way for me to do it than to get home from home with 18.00 at home. This creates a counterweight, because the real development in the company does not succeed. "
This experiment illustrates the importance of leadership as a counterbalance to the anti-innovation organizational environment. Leadership should, in the sense of the metaphor of feeling in psychic systems, choose other options than those already provided by the organization. Otherwise, the new can emerge only subversive or distant organizational - or not at all.
More knowledge - PDF download, eCourses or personal advice
Offline download: Download this text as PDF - Read usage rights, Because we do not automatically submit the title of this text for privacy reasons: When buying in "interests" the title register if support is needed. After buying text exclusively Download at this URL (please save).
Your eCourse on Demand: Choose your personal eCourse on this or another desired topic, As a PDF download. Up to 30 lessons with each 4 learning task + final lesson. Please enter the title under "interests". Alternatively, we are happy to put together your course for you or offer you a personal regular eMailCourse including supervision and certificate - all further information!
Consultant packages: You want to increase your reach or address applicants as an employer? For these and other topics we offer special Consultant packages (overview) - For example, a personal phone call (price is per hour).