Discussion on the topic
To say it straight away: The discussion went past the topic. Presumably, the discussants were also simply chosen badly, because from the work of a digital freelancer, somewhere between the ideals of free self-realization and the dangers of self-exploitation, both have too little idea - more below.
After moderator Cherno Jobatey had torn a joke about Oskar Lafontaine right at the beginning, Sarah Wagenknecht had clearly lost the desire. Jobatey, who always likes to incite the discussants, was unusually calm in the following discussion - he said afterwards that he did not get through.
Objective, but not sweeping
The whole time remained calm and factual, provided facts and could not be seduced to cheaper polemics or even jokes like Philipp Rösler a few weeks ago in the same place. That may not have been a good companion or entertaining, as was noted via Twitter - I thought that was good.
Why was the topic discussed over? Well: On the one hand Gero Hesse, who has been in a secured position with Bertelsmann for years.
On the other hand, Sarah Wagenknecht, who, from her previous work as an author, knows the freelance life, which is the digitalization and the chances that could arise from it, but apparently rather skeptical.
Rhetoric from the previous century
Or what Regine Heidorn so nicely commented, "The left did not make its rhetoric into the 21. Litter over the century. "
It is similar to me: Although I am aware of the dangers of digital exploitation, I can not get along very well with the solution proposals, which have left and unions, such as strikes.
The wrong PR instrument
On the other hand, in my opinion, it is not very expedient for employers to speak of a lack of skilled workers and a labor market in times of low-wage sector and agency work - neither socially nor for self-PR, which is supposed to actually serve this purpose.
This is understood by many in a different way than it should sound - not as a positive, encouraging message, but as a whitewashing.
Which specialists are missing?
From a business perspective, there may even be a shortage of skilled workers - young, highly adaptable, highly qualified people. But when this is so undifferentiated, it leads to irritation - and to the polemical counter-voices that companies so often complain about.
For statements such as "at career loft, the companies are applying to the candidates in the support program" (Hesse in the pre-interview) may not believe many in view of their own economically rather bad situation - and then react accordingly sour.
Real deeds instead of lips
A company that really wanted to avert the threatening danger of a professional deficit would have to go a step further, especially if it is understood as a Career Network as a career network.
That would also take the wind out of the sails of such reviews. It would not have to start with the graduates, but also include the education system - that was briefly mentioned on Thursday.
Employers make it too easy
Frank Heinrich, Berufebilder-Author and former advisor to the Prime Minister of Luxembourg, for example, has nicely put it in a nutshell:
When it comes to education and quality of education, employers are often too easy. First and foremost, they should exploit the untapped potential of those willing to continue learning in their own company and recruit future specialists and executives from the pool of existing employees. [...] So far, however, companies hardly use the opportunity for in-house qualification: In 60 percent of the companies, there are fewer than five training days are available, in each seventh company it is even a maximum of two days.
Include highly qualified lateral thinkers
People like Ex-Taz editor Julia Seeliger or engineer Karen would have to involve two highly qualified people with great problems to find a job in Germany.
Svenja Hofert has recently shown that often only minor details in the communication about top or flop one application decide. Since I want to talk about a shortage of skilled workers, I would like a little more flexibility on the part of the companies.
Communication as a basic problem - Interpreters wanted!
In general, communication, the lack of understanding, seems to me to be the basic problem in the whole discussion - and that can certainly be applied to the whole of society.
So well-known Hesse after the discussion, that he had no pleasure in this defense, in some places where it would have been possible for him to go to Sarah Wagenknech a bit. This is the basic problem. Interpreters urgently sought!
See in the social contect
Although the discussion itself was a bit boring, the evening gave me some exciting insights. Worlds met!
To shut my eyes to these social problems, the widening social gap and growing discontent, I also find the companies themselves dangerous - Greece, Cyprus and the euro crisis greet,
More knowledge - PDF download, eCourses or personal advice
Offline download: Download this text as PDF - Read usage rights, Because we do not automatically submit the title of this text for privacy reasons: When buying in "interests" the title register if support is needed. After buying text exclusively Download at this URL (please save).
Your eCourse on Demand: Choose your personal eCourse on this or another desired topic, As a PDF download. Up to 30 lessons with each 4 learning task + final lesson. Please enter the title under "interests". Alternatively, we are happy to put together your course for you or offer you a personal regular eMailCourse including supervision and certificate - all further information!
Consultant packages: You want to increase your reach or address applicants as an employer? For these and other topics we offer special Consultant packages (overview) - For example, a personal phone call (price is per hour).