Go to Article

Better work, information as desired: We give you the information you really need and are committed to a better and more ecological working environment. When Book Publisher Best of HR – Berufebilder.de® with Unique Book Concept and eCourses we offer over 20 years of experience in Corporate Publishing - with Clients like Samsung, Otto, Governmental Institutions. Publisher Simone Janson also heads the Institute Berufebilder Yourweb, which awards scholarships and belongs to one of the top 10 female German bloggers, referenced in ARD, FAZ, ZEIT, WELT, Wikipedia .

Disclosure & Image Rights: The video material was provided by the respective creator of the video. 

Image rights at udl Digital.

Here writes for you:

Simone Janson is publisherConsultant and one of the 10 most important German bloggers Blogger Relevance Index. She is also head of the Institute's job pictures Yourweb, with which she donates money for sustainable projects. According to ZEIT owns her trademarked blog Best of HR – Berufebilder.de® to the most important blogs for careers, professions and the world of work. More about her im Career.

{Replica} Ancillary copyright debate Springer vs. Google: the 1 euro dispute?

This Thursday, UDL-Digital at Base Camp Christoph Keese from Axel Springer and Kay Oberbeck from Google discussed their highly opposing positions on ancillary copyright. The whole thing was moderated by Cherno Jobatey asked the question whether it is in the whole discussion in the end only 1 Euro. You can now listen to the discussion here exclusively.

strong> Video note: If you do not see a video here, you have to activate the option “Watch videos” under “Privacy and cookies” at the end of the page!

Performance Protection: What was going on?

Unlike Jobatey's casual statement and the heading of this article, and as the "handout" in the photo above suggests, the subject is pretty serious.

Google is to be obliged by law to pay publishers license fees for the use of teasers (ie short texts) in the search results.

Tip: Text as PDF (please read the instructions!) or to this text complete eCourse or series Download. Actions or news via Newsletter!

Performance protection pro and contra

The reason for this is that it is a protective gap since other recyclers, For example. The power protection right is also necessary in order to protect press equipment against an unfair exploitation of their performance by search engines.

There has been resistance to this law on the Internet for years, and recently, Google has launched an anti-LSR campaign as the main target of the publishing industry, which is being discussed in the web with some ambivalence.

Arguments of the opponents are, among other things, that press publishers are already sufficiently protected by the copyright. Moreover, every publisher can secure their information offerings by not placing them free of charge on the Internet. In addition, indexing could be blocked by search engine.

The Google

In the discussion on the right to the right of performance, two opposing poles had developed: Axel-Springer-AG as the main advocate of the bill and Google.

And exactly that met on the St. Nicholas Day 2012 now at UDL-Digital in the form of Director, Communication and Public Affairs, Google DACH, Nordics, Benelux and Christoph Keese, Group Director Public Affairs of Axel Springer AG.

The 1 Euro dispute?

Above all, I found three highlights of the discussion exciting: Cherno Jobatey, who addressed Fraga to Christoph Keese, about what the sum would be.

And Keese, who after some back and forth finally named an (arbitrary) sum for the snippets from all German press products, namely 1 euro per half year. "That's really cheap now," joked Jobatey. Is argued about a 1 here.

Is the LSR technically feasible?

Exciting for me also the discussion between Matthias Schindler aka @pressroi and Keese. Schindler asked directly whether Keese had any idea how to separate press products from non-press products,

ME is a fundamental question, because it shows that the LSR as planned is not technically correct at all. Christoph Keese, on the other hand, did not understand the question and did not consider the aspect important.

Keese: “I'm not stupid and I'm not lying”

However, Keese went on to Schindler more or less directly: he was tired of being hired on the Internet as someone who is either stupid or lying.

Note: The extremely interesting, almost one-hour discussion I had first recorded, but this audio file has now been replaced due to the poor sound quality due to the 20-Minutes video of UDL-Digital (see above).

Find out more - our books on the subject

One answer to "{replica} ancillary copyright debate Springer vs. Google: the 1 euro dispute?"

  1. Ancillary copyright: United in disagreement | UdL-Digital says:

    [...] Further reports on the UdL Digital Talk were published by kriegs -recht, heise, Meedia, die Netzpiloten, by Presseschauder, by heyeje, in the writing room, by Jens Best and by Berufebilder. [...]

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * .

Ja, I would like to be informed about the latest promotions and offers via Newsletter be informed.

I hereby accept the Debate Rules and the Privacy policy with the possibility to contradict the use of my data at any time.

error: warning The content is protected!