Best of HR – Berufebilder.de® sets topics in the media: makes intelligence more successful or not?


We want to make work more humane and ecological, therefore we donate - documented - revenue for afforestation. When Publisher Best of HR - Berufebilder.de® with books, on-demand eCourses and a news service we share 15 years of experience with our customers (Samsung, Otto, state institutions). By the Top20 -Blogger Simone Janson, referenced in ARD, ZEIT, Wikipedia .
Copyright: Rights .

The day before yesterday, inspired by a new commentary, I shared an older post again in the social media. Theme: Do the dumb ones have more success? Good 3000 releases, 34 comments and media releases, which I was referred to because of their similarity to my thesis, show: The theme moves the minds. Best of HR – Berufebilder.de® sets topics in the media: makes intelligence more successful or not? Best of HR – Berufebilder.de® sets topics in the media: makes intelligence more successful or not?


More knowledge - eCourses or personal advice

Here writes for you: Simone Janson is a publisher, German Top20 blogger and HR communication consultant. Profile

Too smart for success?

Overview

"Above all, the stupid ones are successful - I'm just too clever to be successful". For me, that sounds like whining at a high level. How could you better justify your own failures than by saying, I'm just too smart to be successful.? wrote Robin Brunold in his commentary - and rekindled the discussion on a topic that had already gone online in April 2010 and already caused a stir then.

We put topics in the media

Overview

Because then I brought up the old post again, he was again very heatedly discussed, especially on Twitter and on Best of HR – Berufebilder.de® as well as from various media.

For example, he was hired by media representatives as the career editor of ZEIT ONLINE tweeted (see comments in the post) and at Spiegel Online there was a publication, which I was addressed by several readers, because the title and also a few excerpts resumed the thesis of my post, even if Spiegel Online informed me via comment (see below update) later, that it seems to be a older contribution from mirror job, of which I have not seen any evidence.

But what I really mean: I would like to pick up and discuss the exciting theses of the Spiegel article, whose authors, of course, have dealt with the subject in much more detail. This is because scientific studies were also used here to discuss the question of whether IQ tests are useful for applications and, consequently, whether intelligence is better for a career or not.

What studies prove

Overview

The authors come to the conclusion that, although initially intelligence is not critical, if one follows empirical studies, but already. Intelligence is not harmful, but maybe it should not be too much then. And finally, really different factors decide: diligence, charm, unscrupulousness, manners, network, gender or even luck. That's the impression, but the empiricism comes to a different conclusion. A long-term meta-analysis shows that the more intelligent an employee is, the sooner he will deliver good work and be successful in his career.

Smart disturbance?

Overview

This actually sounds logical, and yet the mirror writers in the further course of their article show that intelligence is a fairly relative matter and confirm what I in my article wrote: Often, intelligent people also disrupt the processes in Company: They are not only very critical with themselves, but with others, questioning work processes, can not adapt well, putting their finger on wounds. As a result, they make the bosses nervous, they could even cheer up the colleagues. So fire better right now! For Schlaumeier and Neunmalkluge are unpopular, already in the school and also in enterprise. The high-powered nerd, who can not communicate clearly, has the look.

For intelligence, therefore, the mirror authors also conclude, also to back again, not to show the other man their stupidity before the eyes and thus not to spread salt into wounds.

Adaptation as a sign of intelligence?

Overview

Adaptation, then, as a success strategy and the intelligence as a sign that this adaptation is mastered? This may be right in the short term, but whether it is the right strategy in the long term, for one itself, the company and the society, may be questioned.

You could list examples from the history here, but I would rather have one here Blogpost of Svenja HofertIt makes clear how important even the hard-working, unpopular cross-heads are for the long-term success of a company.

If you are intelligent, you should not renounce it. Whether this intelligence can actually be measured in IQ tests is something that not only the commentators of the Spiegel article doubt.


More knowledge - eCourses or personal advice

Overview


Offline download: Download this text as PDF - Read usage rights, Because we do not automatically submit the title of this text for privacy reasons: When buying in "interests" the title register if support is needed. After buying text exclusively Download at this URL (please save).

3,35 Book now


Your eCourse on Demand: Choose your personal eCourse on this or another desired topic, As a PDF download. Up to 30 lessons with each 4 learning task + final lesson. Please enter the title under "interests". Alternatively, we are happy to put together your course for you or offer you a personal regular eMailCourse including supervision and certificate - all further information!

16,20 Book now


Consultant packages: You want to increase your reach or address applicants as an employer? For these and other topics we offer special Consultant packages (overview) - For example, a personal phone call (price is per hour).

149,99 Book now


occupations pictures

You want to comment here? Please the Debate Rules comply, contributions must be unlocked. Your eMailAddress remains secret. More information on the use of your data and how you can counter this can be found in our Privacy Policy.

  1. To follow debate on this post
  2. All debates follow
  3. Debates per eMail subscribe (add link here!)
  1. CareerSPIEGEL

    As you may overestimate, your blog ("sets topics in media") but bad. SPON contribution is from magazine SPIEGEL JOB.

    • Simone Janson

      Thanks for the hint, I have the same in the text. This is not from me, but from some of my readers who have referred to the similarity of the topics. You see that the impression is also created by others.

  2. Knut Bochum

    RT @aschwandenb: The smarter, the boss? - Exciting contributionjg7t7BttU0

  3. Competencepartner

    PROFESSIONAL IMAGES poses topics in the media: Makes intelligence more successful or not ... # Profession # Education

  4. Christa Lieb

    "@washwandenb: The smarter, the boss? - Exciting contributiondDjhhq0tnt "Not necessarily (from experience) ;-) LG

  5. Felix Farkas

    RT @aschwandenb: The smarter, the boss? - Exciting contributionjg7t7BttU0

  6. Barbara Aschwanden

    The smarter the boss? - Exciting contributionjg7t7BttU0

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * .

JaI would like to be regularly informed about the latest promotions & offers Newsletter be informed.

I hereby accept the Debate Rules and the Privacy policy with the possibility to contradict the use of my data at any time.